CANTOR ET UX.

v.

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Piper v. Chris-Craft Indus., Inc., 430 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1977)
  …eror); Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F. 2d 787 (1969) (action for an injunction under § 10 (b) by a tender offeror against the target corporation); Iroquois Industries, Inc. v. Syracuse China Corp., 417 F. 2d 963 (1969), cert. denied, 399 U. S. 909 (1970) (action under § 10 (b) by a tender offeror against the target corporation). The District Court had looked to whether Chris-Craft would have succeeded in securing control even if Bangor had abided by the securities laws. In its analysis of ca…
• Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …attenuated to the extent that remedies are available t.o nonpurchasers and nonsellers under state law. Cf. § 28 of the 1934 Act, 15 U. S. C. § 78bb. See Iroquois Industries, Inc. v. Syracuse China Corp., 417 F. 2d 963, 969 (CA2 1969), cert. denied, 399 U. S. 909 (1970). Thus, for example, in Birnbaum itself, while the plaintiffs found themselves without federal remedies, the conduct alleged as the gravamen of the federal complaint later provided the basis for recovery in a cause of action based on state la…
• Chris-Craft Indus., Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 480 F.2d 341 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …the 1968 amendment is an indication that “there was no standing to sue under Rule 10b-5 by either the tender offeror or by the target corporation^. Iroquois Industries, Inc. v. Syracuse China Corp., 417 F. 2d 963, 969-70 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 909 (1970). While we have not heretofore squarely held that a private right of action for damages can be implied from § 14(e) in favor of a party in CCI’s position, we have indicated that such an implied right of action would be reasonable. Section 14(…

  ← 1 / 2 →