SCOTT

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Darwin Clark Bailey, 468 F.2d 652 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …in larger type and on a larger card or paper.” Id. See also United States v. Alexander, 3 Cir. 1971, 441 F. 2d 403; United States v. Van Dusen, 1 Cir. 1970, 431 F. 2d 1278; United States v. Osterberg, 9 Cir. 1970, 423 F. 2d 704, cert. denied, 1970, 399 U.S. 914, 90 S.Ct. 2216, 26 L.Ed.2d 571. We note with approval that in the instant case the “better practice” was followed.7 We do not mean to intimate, as counsel for appellant fears, that one schooled in the rights afforded by Miranda need not be effectiv…
• United States v. Burnis Bryant, 461 F.2d 912 (6th Cir. 1972)
  …respect to the witnesses to be called to prove its case. The government is not ordinarily compelled to call all witnesses competent to testify including special agents or informers.” United States v. Mosby, 422 F. 2d 72, 74 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 914, 90 S.Ct. 2217, 26 L.Ed.2d 571 (1970).1 Nevertheless, there are situations when the Government, as a matter of due process, is required to call a witness who the Government has reason to believe will give exculpatory testimony. See Brady v. Maryland…
• United States v. Hopkins, 433 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …e of his constitutional rights with regard to Hobbs’ query and, by his answer, Hopkins knowingly waived those rights. See Maguire v. United States, 9 Cir. 1968, 396 F. 2d 327; cf. United States v. Osterburg, 9 Cir. 1970, 423 F. 2d 704, cert. denied, 399 U.S. 914, 90 S.Ct. 2216, 26 L.Ed.2d 571; Connors v. South Dakota, 8 Cir. 1970, 422 F. 2d 122, cert. denied, 398 U.S. 954, 90 S.Ct. 1881, 26 L.Ed.2d 297. The judgment is affirmed.…