TEPLITSKY

v.

ASSOCIATED PRESS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Stetter, 445 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …ing an otherwise prima facie case of conscientious objection. E. g., Carson v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 411 F. 2d 631, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 865, 90 S.Ct. 143, 24 L.Ed.2d 119; United States v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1969, 411 F. 2d 224, cert. denied, 399 U.S. 916, 90 S.Ct. 2204, 26 L.Ed.2d 574; Salamy v. United States, 10 Cir. 1967, 379 F. 2d 838. Other courts have disagreed with this proposition and held that imminence of induction by itself is never sufficient to refute what otherwise appears to be a since…
• Morrissey v. Lou V. Brewer, 443 F.2d 942 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …the basis of denial of counsel but merely argue that the Mempa holding supports their contention of a right to a hearing as a requirement of due process. . Note that in Alverez v. Turner, 422 F. 2d 214 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, McDorman v. Turner, 399 U.S. 916, 90 S.Ct. 2221, 26 L.Ed.2d 574 (1970), the court reiterated its earlier position that Mempa is not applicable to parole revocation proceedings which are not a part of the sentencing process. Id. at 218. However, in this same case, the court afforded…
• Sweeten v. Sneddon, 463 F.2d 713 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …race not constitutionally mandated,” parole from a state conviction is neither federally required or protected, provided a revocation hearing is “inherently fair.” Alverez v. Turner, 10 Cir., 422 F. 2d 214, 217, 220, cert. denied McDorman v. Turner, 399 U.S. 916, 90 S.Ct. 2221, 26 L.Ed.2d 574. A threat to that status does not involve constitutional rights, see e. g. Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 485-486, 85 S.Ct. 1116, 14 L.Ed.2d 22, and there is no claim that a parole revocation hearing, if held, wo…