YOUNGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
v.
HARRIS ET AL.; BOYLE, JUDGE, ET AL. V. LANDRY ET AL.; SAMUELS ET AL. V. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, ET AL.; FERNANDEZ V. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, ET AL.; BODDIE ET AL. V. CONNECTICUT ET AL.; SANKS ET AL. V. GEORGIA ET AL.; DYSON ET AL. V. STEIN; BYRNE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY, ET AL. V. KARALEXIS ET AL.
YOUNGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
HARRIS ET AL.; BOYLE, JUDGE, ET AL. V. LANDRY ET AL.; SAMUELS ET AL. V. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, ET AL.; FERNANDEZ V. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, ET AL.; BODDIE ET AL. V. CONNECTICUT ET AL.; SANKS ET AL. V. GEORGIA ET AL.; DYSON ET AL. V. STEIN; BYRNE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY, ET AL. V. KARALEXIS ET AL.
399 U.S. 922
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (U.S. 1971)…h effectively bar persons on relief from commencing actions therein.” 286 F. Supp. 968, 972. We noted probable jurisdiction, 395 U. S. 974 (1969). The case was heard at the 1969 Term and thereafter was [*374] set for reargument at the present Term. 399 U. S. 922 (1970). We now reverse.2 Our conclusion is that, given the basic position of the marriage relationship in this society’s hierarchy of values and the concomitant state monopolization of the means for legally dissolving this relationship, due process…
-
Sanks v. Georgia, 401 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1971)…Supreme Court, provided further that the landlords would become entitled to such double rent should the tenant-appellants lose their cases. The case was first heard by us at the 1969 Term, and was thereafter set for reargument at the present Term. 399 U. S. 922 (1970). At reargument it became apparent that events occurring subsequent to our notation of probable jurisdiction had so drastically undermined the premises on which we originally set this case for plenary consideration as to lead us to conclude th…
-
Livingston v. Garmire, 437 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1971)…ded that the plaintiffs would have no meaningful remedy in the Florida courts based on their constitutional contentions. . Unpublished. . Appeal dismissed, 1968, 393 U.S. 220, 89 S.Ct. 455, 21 L.Ed.2d 392 restored to calendar for reargument, 1970, 399 U.S. 922, 90 S.Ct. 2227, 26 L.Ed.2d 788. . In each of those cases the court upheld the constitutionality of the anti-riot provisions of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2101, 2102. The definition of the term “riot” as used in those section…