CAMPBELL

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Gurganus v. State, 451 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1984)
  …s ability to understand the wrongness of the act committed. Brown v. State, 245 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1971), vacated on other grounds, 408 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 2870, 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972); Campbell v. State, 227 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1969), cert. [*821] dismissed, 400 U.S. 801, 91 S.Ct. 7, 27 L.Ed.2d 33 (1970); Zamora v. State, 361 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 372 So. 2d 472 (Fla.1979); Evans v. State, 140 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). Evidence which does not go toward proving or disproving an individua…
• Wilton Amos Ross v. State, 474 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1985)
  …U.S. 1163, 102 S.Ct. 1037, 71 L.Ed.2d 319 (1982). Premeditation, often being impossible to prove by direct testimony, may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the homicide. Campbell v. State, 227 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1969), petition dismissed, 400 U.S. 801, 91 S.Ct. 7, 27 L.Ed.2d 33 (1970); Dawson v. State, 139 So. 2d 408 (Fla.1962). The evidence in the instant case reveals that the appellant was angry with the victim and that he brutally beat her about the face, head, torso, and extremities, with fis…
• Hall v. State, 568 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1990)
  …tate, 444 So. 2d 939 (Fla.1984).6 The legal test of insanity in Florida, for criminal purposes, has long been the so-called “M’Naghten Rule.” Anderson v. State, 276 So. 2d 17 (Fla.1973); Campbell v. State, 227 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1969), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 801, 91 S.Ct. 7, 27 L.Ed.2d 33 (1970); Piccott v. State, 116 So. 2d 626 (Fla.1959), appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 293, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed.2d 83 (1960); Davis v. State, 44 Fla. 32, 32 So. 822 (1902). Under the M’Naghten Rule an accused is no…