CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.

v.

SWANN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Lowe v. Broward Cnty., 766 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …v. Dade County, 334 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Putting it another way, a conflict exists when two legislative enactments “cannot co-exist.” E.B. Elliott Advertising Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 425 F. 2d 1141 (5th Cir.1970), pet. dismissed, 400 U.S. 805, 91 S.Ct. 12, 27 L.Ed.2d 12 (1970); Metropolitan Dade County v. Santos, 430 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 438 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1983). Laborers’ Int'l Union of N. Am., Local 178 v. Burroughs, 541 So. 2d 1160, 1161 (Fla. 1989)…
• The Coca-Cola Co. v. State, 406 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1981)
  …e, as well as those specifically intended to promote the public safety or the public health. Id. 237 U.S. at 59, 35 S.Ct. at 502 (emphasis supplied). In E. B. Elliot Adv. Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 425 F. 2d 1141 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 805, 91 S.Ct. 12, 27 L.Ed.2d 35 (1970), the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether an ordinance prohibiting commercial advertising signs in certain areas and regulating them in others was a proper exercise of the police power an…
• Laborers' Int'l Union OF N. Am. v. Myrtice Burroughs, 541 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1989)
  …v. Dade County, 334 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Putting it another way, a conflict exists when two legislative enactments “cannot co-exist.” E.B. Elliott Advertising Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 425 F. 2d 1141 (5th Cir.1970), pet. dismissed, 400 U.S. 805, 91 S.Ct. 12, 27 L.Ed.2d 12 (1970); Metropolitan Dade County v. Santos, 430 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 438 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1983). Neither formulation of the rule applies in a situation like this one in which the identical…