PENNSYLVANIA
v.
NEW YORK ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Pennsylvania brought an original jurisdiction action against New York and other states concerning an interstate dispute, and the Supreme Court granted Pennsylvania's motion to file a bill of complaint and Connecticut's motion to intervene as plaintiff, then appointed a Special Master to oversee discovery and proceedings with authority to take evidence and issue subpoenas.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
[Motion to file bill of complaint granted, 398 U. S. 956.] Motion of the State of Connecticut for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff granted.
It is Ordered that John F. Davis, Esquire, of Washington, D. C., be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct 'subsequent proceedings, and with authority' to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The compensation of' the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.
It is Further Ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of Court, The Chief Justice shall have the authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. The City OF Brighton, 441 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1971)…. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 1968, 392 U.S. 409, 439, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189, a relic of slavery, Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., supra, at 443, 88 S.Ct. 2186, or a badge of inequality, Palmer v. Thompson, 5 Cir. 1969, 419 F. 2d 1222, cert. granted, 400 U.S. 811, 91 S.Ct. 32, 27 L.Ed.2d 41, such a segregated institution is one of the many humiliations which society has visited upon the black man. The Supreme Court and others have taken occasion to note the feelings of inferiority generated in the “hearts an…
-
Pennsylvania v. NEW York, 407 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1972)…ania’s position. We granted leave to file the bill of complaint, 398 U. S. 956, permitted the State of Connecticut to intervene as a party plaintiff, and appointed Mr. John F. Davis as a Special Master to take evidence and make appropriate reports. 400 U. S. 811. Thereafter, California and Indiana were permitted to intervene as plaintiffs, and Arizona as.a defendant. 400 U. S. 924, 1019 ; 401 U. S. 931. The exception of Indiana as to a typographical error in the recommended decree is sustained. The phrase…
-
Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc. v. O'Keeffe, 442 F.2d 508 (5th Cir. 1971)…amination, the underlying question of whether agency action based upon hearsay medical evidence satisfies the substantial evidence test may soon be answered by the Supreme Court. See Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Perales, 400 U.S. 811, 91 S.Ct. 32, 27 L.Ed.2d 41, on certiorari from Cohen v. Perales, 5 Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 44, rehearing denied 416 F. 2d 1250, argued before the Supreme Court on January 13, 1971, 39 U.S.L.W. 3286.…
Authorities Cited
- Cannon v. Green, 398 U.S. 956 (U.S. 1970)
- Young v. Scott, 398 U.S. 956 (U.S. 1970)