WILLIE ANDREW MCDOWELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1967-03-02
No. I-285
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and SPECTOR and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
195 So. 2d 586 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court affirmed the denial of a motion to vacate a conviction and sentence, holding that a prisoner cannot seek relief from a sentence if they are currently serving a different, valid sentence.


Holding

No, a prisoner cannot seek relief from a conviction and sentence under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 if they are currently serving a different, valid sentence, because a favorable ruling would not result in their release from custody.


Key Quotes

“It is clear that before relief by motion under Criminal Rule 1 may be sought, it must appear that a favorable ruling upon such a motion will result in release of the movant from custody.”

Establishes the prerequisite for seeking relief under Criminal Rule 1.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The appellant filed a motion to vacate a conviction and sentence under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1. At the time of filing, the appellant was already…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside conviction and sentence under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. Chapter 924, Appendix.

Review of the record on appeal and briefs herein reflects that at the time appellant filed his Rule 1 motion in the trial court, he was serving a lawfully imposed sentence other than the sentence which his motion attacks.

It is clear that before relief by motion under Criminal Rule 1 may be sought, it must appear that a favorable ruling upon such a motion will result in release of the movant from custody. Such a showing cannot be made, of course, where the record on appeal reflects, as is here the case, the existence of a valid sentence being served contemporaneously with the sentence under assault. Johnson v. State, 184 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1966).

The order of the lower court is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and SPECTOR and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Coral Gables v. Sakolsky, 215 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
    …v. Autrey, Fla. 1957, 96 So. 2d 784. Zoning is the exclusive function of the appropriate zoning authorities and not the Courts, Hillsborough County v. Twin Lakes Mobile Home Village, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 191; Allen v. Secor, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So. 2d 586, and a city’s motive in enacting a zoning or rezoning ordinance is not subject to judicial inquiry. Housing Authority of City of Melbourne v. Richardson, Fla.App. 1967, 196 So. 2d 489. Thus, zoning as applied to the height of buildings has been uphe…
  • Town OF N. Redington Beach v. Winnie G. Williams, 220 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
    …rey, Fla. 1957, 96 So. 2d 784. Zoning is the exclusive function of the appropri [*24] ate zoning authorities and not the Courts, Hillsborough County v. Twin Lakes Mobile Home Village, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 191; Allen v. Secor, Fla.App.1967, 195 So. 2d 586, and a city’s motive in enacting a zoning or rezoning ordinance is not subject to judicial inquiry. Housing Authority of City of Melbourne v. Richardson, Fla.App.1967, 196 So. 2d 489.” Zoning is not a matter for the Courts to decide or ordain by ju…
  • Chapman v. State, 300 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
    …3.850, by its terms, applys only to “a prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by the Laws of Florida.” Since appellant is not in Florida custody, he is not entitled to relief under said rule. See McDowell v. State, Fla.App. (1st) 195 So. 2d 586. Affirmed. RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw