SHAKESPEARE CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• Barnes v. United States, 412 U.S. 837 (U.S. 1973)
  …E. g., United States v. Russo, 413 F. 2d 432 (CA2 1969); United States v. Smith, 446 F. 2d 200 (CA4 1971); United States v. Winbush, 428 F. 2d 357 (CA6), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 918 (1970); United States v. Hood, 422 F. 2d 737 (CA7), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 820 (1970); United States v. Dilella, 354 F. 2d 584 (CA7 1965). The reasoning of the statutory-inference cases is applicable to analysis of common-law inferences. Cf. United States v. Gainey, 380 U. S. 63, 70 (1965); Rules of Evidence for United States…
• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …art. Appellants attempt to draw a parallel between this case and those in which courts have held inadmissible statements made after a motive arose to fabricate. In Felice v. Long Island Railroad Company, 426 F. 2d 192 (2nd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 820, 91 S.Ct. 37, 27 L.Ed.2d 47 (1970), the court ruled inadmissible a statement made by a plaintiff concerning the cause of his accident. Plaintiff made the statement six weeks after he had instituted suit against his employer under the FELA to recover…
• United States v. Ruffin, 575 F.2d 346 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …in the county clerk’s office said, the government was eliciting from the witness classic “multiple hearsay,” United States v. Maddox, 444 F. 2d 148, 150 (2d Cir. 1971); Felice v. Long Island Railroad Co., 426 F. 2d 192, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 820, 91 S.Ct. 37, 27 L.Ed.2d 47 (1970); Yates v. Bair Transport, Inc., 249 F.Supp. 681, 684-85 (S.D.N.Y. 1965), or, as characterized in the Federal Rules of Evidence, “[h]earsay included within hearsay.” Fed.R.Evid. 805. Inasmuch as it was offered to p…