J. C. VAN VOORHIS, AS TRUSTEE OF GIBBS CORPORATION, BANKRUPT, APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR J. GUTMAN, APPELLEE
J. C. VAN VOORHIS, AS TRUSTEE OF GIBBS CORPORATION, BANKRUPT, APPELLANT,
ARTHUR J. GUTMAN, APPELLEE
195 So. 2d 614
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Ford v. Magee (2d Cir. 1947) 160 F.2d 457; Matthews v. Matthews (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 497; Klosenski v. Flaherty (Fla.1959) 116 So.2d 767, 82 A.L.R.2d 664; Roess v. Malsby Co., 69 Fla. 15, 67 So. 226.
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Est. of Garfield A. Wood v. Chowning, 271 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…id is a civil matter or action. The proceeding is one conferred by statute, [*44] and would be by separate suit except that the statute directs it to be filed in the probate case. This rule has been reaffirmed in Dierickx v. Wisehart, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So. 2d 614. RCP 1.010, 30 F.S.A., provides that the rules of civil procedure will apply to all suits of a civil nature and all special statutory proceedings, and that the form, content, procedure and time for pleading in all special statutory proceedings shal…
-
Hyman ASH v. Coconut Grove Bank, 448 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…e reverse the trial court’s order which limited the father’s award and remand for a determination of a reasonable fee for services rendered. Lucom v. Atlantic National Bank of West Palm Beach, 97 So. 2d 478 (Fla.1957); Dier- [*608] ickx v. Wisehart, 195 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). As to the Bank, however, to the extent that the Bank’s abdication of its role as guardian of the property caused the fees to be increased beyond what would be normal and reasonable in defense of a petition for reimbursement, the…
-
West v. Food Fair Stores, Inc., 305 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…ing a young, child, a package and a wallet while reaching for an item on a shelf. Assuming arguendo there is error, failure to show prejudice or harm renders it harmless error pursuant to § 59.041, Fla. Stat. See Dierickx v. Wisehart, Fla.App.1967, 195 So. 2d 614. Therefore, we conclude that no reversible error has been demonstrated and this cause hereby is affirmed. Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Klosenski v. Flaherty, 116 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 1959)
- Matthews v. Olive M. Matthews & Soft Water Laundry, Inc., 177 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Ford v. Magee, 160 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1947)
- Roess v. The Malsby Co., 69 Fla. 15 (Fla. 1915)