JAMES RILEY, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES RILEY, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
195 So. 2d 635
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1967)
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A
ALLEN, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Savage v. State, 156 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)
- Dias v. State, 158 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Hinton v. State, 177 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Stacey v. State, 165 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)