RAMBEAU

v.

RUNDLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Projansky, 465 F.2d 123 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …. . Id. at 4488, 4489 (Keller). . Id. at 3092 (Kozak). . Id. at 3115-16 (Kozak). . But see Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 495, 37 S.Ct. 192, 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917); United States v. Phillips, 426 F. 2d 1069, 1071 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 843, 91 S.Ct. 86, 27 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970). . But see Blumenthal v. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 557, 68 S.Ct. 248, 256, 92 L.Ed. 154 (1947) (“ . . . the law rightly gives room for allowing the conviction of those discovered upon showing sufficiently the e…
• United States v. Zaran Dunloy, 584 F.2d 6 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …Under the federal rule an accomplice’s uncorroborated testimony, although subject to strict and careful scrutiny, may nevertheless be sufficient alone to support a conviction. United States v. Phillips, 426 F. 2d 1069, 1071 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 843, 91 S.Ct. 86, 27 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970). . In addition, of course, the determination of U. S. Magistrate Kent Sinclair was entitled to weight. Mapp v. Warden, supra, 531 F. 2d at 1172; United States v. Londono, 553 F. 2d 805, 810 (2d Cir. 1977). . Pers…
• United States v. Ferrara, 458 F.2d 868 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …son, a co-defendant, to prove its ease. This claim, however, ignores the well established rule that a guilty verdict may rest upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. United States v. Phillips, 426 F. 2d 1069, 1071 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 843 (1970); United States v. Corallo, 413 F. 2d 1306, 1323 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 958 (1969). Moreover, an examination of the record reveals that the essential elements of Gleason’s testimony were corroborated by the testimony of numerous oth…