HICKS

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Chatham, 568 F.2d 445 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …use. We have held, however, that there can be no Dyer Act violation if the defendant formed his intention to steal the vehicle after interstate transportation has been completed.11 United States v. Richards, 425 F. 2d 432 (5 Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 845, 91 S.Ct. 90, 27 L.Ed.2d 82 (1970). See also United States v. Diodati, 355 F. 2d 806 (4 Cir. 1966). [*452] Under this charge, it becomes apparent that the jury could have convicted Chatham if it determined that he intended to steal the car in Colora…

  ← 1 / 2 →