MARKEE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …ed in any particular way, [took] only a few minutes to recite, and [was] sandwiched between a summary of other evidence" did not deprive defendant of his right of confrontation); United States v. Carlson, 423 F. 2d 431, 437 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 847, 91 S.Ct. 94, 27 L.Ed.2d 84 (1970) (posing of hypothetical question, assumed to be equivalent to testimony by a non-testifying co-defendant, created at most only minimal prejudice to defendants); United States v. Sparano, 422 F. 2d 1095, 1099 (2d Ci…
• Isiah Carl Green v. McKASKLE, 788 F.2d 1116 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …fore or after service of process and before or after the defendant’s answer. See Spears, 766 F. 2d at 180 n. 1 (5th Cir.1985); Anderson v. Coughlin, 700 F. 2d 37, 41 (2d Cir.1983); Brown v. Schneckloth, 421 F. 2d 1402, 1403 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 847, 91 S.Ct. 95, 27 L.Ed.2d 85 (1970). It is, of course, not always easy to determine whether a claim is frivolous simply by examining the pleadings. Prisoner complaints are notoriously difficult to decipher, and pro se pleadings must be construed lib…
• United States v. Lange, 528 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …Stephenson, 474 F. 2d 1353, 1355 (5th Cir. 1974).14 A violation of § 1001 requires proof that the defendant had the specific intent to make a false or fraudulent statement, cf. United States v. Markee, 425 F. 2d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 847, 91 S.Ct. 93, 27 L.Ed.2d 84 (1970). The misrepresentation must have been made deliberately, United States v. Mekjian, 505 F. 2d 1320, 1324 (5th Cir. 1975), knowingly and wilfully, United States v. Smith, supra, or at least with reckless disregard of…