PATTERSON

v.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lurz, 666 F.2d 69 (4th Cir. 1981)
  …9, 87 S.Ct. 135, 17 L.Ed.2d 96 (1966). Cf. United States v. Harris, 542 F. 2d 1283, 1293-94 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 934, 97 S.Ct. 1558, 51 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977); United States v. Munroe, 421 F. 2d 644, 645 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 851, 91 S.Ct. 79, 27 L.Ed.2d 89 (1970). The charge of egregious default by the prosecutors is simply not sustained by the record. Other considerations militating against the Jencks Act assertions are: 1) Jones’ testimony in Florida, when ultimately tr…
• United States v. Vandemark, 522 F.2d 1019 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …s. E. g., United States ex rel. Sperling v. Fitzpatrick, 426 F. 2d 1161, 1163-66 (2d Cir. 1970) (opinions of Hays, J., and Lumbard, C. J.); In re Martinez, 1 Cal.3d 641, 648-52, 83 Cal.Rptr. 382, 386-89, 463 P. 2d 734, 738-41, cert. de [*1021] nied, 400 U.S. 851, 91 S.Ct. 71, 27 L.Ed.2d 88 (1970). As the district judge correctly considered the evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, there was ample evidence to support the revocation of probation. Vandemark next argues that even if…
• United States v. $64, 722 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …in Aspen, Colorado and Shreve [*244] port, Louisiana, could have been “executed ... at any place within the jurisdiction of the United States.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 4(d)(2). See also Gill v. United States, 421 F. 2d 1353, 1354-55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 851, 91 S.Ct. 85, 27 L.Ed.2d 89 (1970).5 The officer need not have the warrant in his possession, though “upon request” he shall show it to the defendant “as soon as possible.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 4(d)(3). Here, there is no evidence of such a request. Moreov…