ADAMS ET AL.

v.

CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS ET AL.; MOSCA V. UNITED STATES; MAIORANI V. KAWASAKI KISEN K. K., KOBE, ET AL.; DAPPER V. MUNICIPAL COURT, SAN DIEGO JUDICIAL DISTRICT; ZIMMERMAN V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; SOMMER ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CARLOUGH V. RICHARDSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE; VASILJ V. UNITED STATES; CARTER ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; TAYLOR V. SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; LOPEZ V. UNITED STATES; HARDIE V. NEVILLE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Rosner, 485 F.2d 1213 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …or disclosing the United States Attorney’s report to defense counsel, see United States v. Trice, 412 F. 2d 209 (6 Cir. 1969); United States v. Solomon, 422 F. 2d 1110 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 2201, 26 L.Ed.2d 565, reh. denied, 400 U.S. 855, 91 S.Ct. 26, 27 L.Ed.2d 93 (1970), but we feel that he should have given counsel sufficient time for useful examination and rebuttal in view of the one-sided and potentially devastating disclosures of asserted bad conduct by the defendant.26 Audi a…
• Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972)
  ….Ct. 539.) The precise issue was not raised nor decided in United States v. Weinberg (9th Cir. 1971) 439 F. 2d 743 and Carter v. United States (9th Cir. 1969) 417 F. 2d 384, cert. denied 399 U.S. 935, 90 S.Ct. 2253, 26 L.Ed.2d 807, rehearing denied, 400 U.S. 855, 91 S.Ct. 27, 27 L.Ed.2d 93. We recognize that there are dicta from the Third and Seventh Circuits that imply that immunity conferred under former 47 U.S.C. § 409(l) was coextensive with the questions asked. (See In re Grand Jury Investigation of G…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Getty OIL Co. (Eastern Operations), Inc. v. Ruckelshaus, 467 F.2d 349 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …isdiction of either the district courts or the appellate courts to cases not otherwise within their competence. See Zimmerman v. United States Government, 422 F. 2d 326 (3d Cir. 1970) cert. den. 399 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 2200, 26 L.Ed.2d 565, reh. den. 400 U.S. 855, 91 S.Ct. 26, 27 L.Ed.2d 93 (1970); Mattingly v. Elias, 325 F.Supp. 1374 (E.D.Pa.1971). Mindful as we are of the principle enunciated in Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 87 S.Ct. 1507, 18 L.Ed.2d 681 (1967), that courts should restrict…