HINES

v.

NEW JERSEY

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Dismukes v. State, 324 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …ounsel’s advice might thereby assume the risk that Willis, though not then a State agent, would record the conversation and afterwards barter it to the State for leniency [United States ex rel. Milani v. Pate, 425 F. 2d 6 (7th Cir. 970), cert. den., 400 U.S. 867, 91 S.Ct. 109, 27 L.Ed.2d 107 (1970)], but counsel did not knowingly submit Dismukes to direct State efforts, through an agent, to interrogate and elicit incriminating statements. Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. at 206, 84 S.Ct. 1199. Neither th…
• Millard Robert Beasley v. United States, 491 F.2d 687 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …torney for his client made the proceedings a farce and a mockery of justice, shocking to the conscience of the Court.” Hayes v. Russell, 405 F. 2d 859, 860 (6th Cir. 1969). See also Holnagel v. Kropp, 426 F. 2d 777, 779 (6th Cir. 1970) cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867, 91 S.Ct. 108, 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970); Palfy v. Cardwell, 448 F. 2d 328, 330 (6th Cir. 1971). In view of the persuasive arguments against reaffirming the “farce and mockery” standard as a meaningful test of the Sixth Amendment right to the effective…
• United States v. Baldwin, 644 F.2d 381 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ernment’s evidence of insured status. Uncontradicted testimony the deposits were federally insured is sufficient. See United States v. McIntosh, 463 F. 2d 250 (3rd Cir. 1972); United States v. Phillips, 427 F. 2d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867, 91 S.Ct. 108, 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970). As a final contention, Baldwin claims he was denied due process of law because District Court read the instructions to the jury so rapidly the jury was confused and interpreted this delivery as a comment on the…