BROOKS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ackerson, 502 F.2d 300 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …t believe that the defendant, whose trial occurred within seventeen months after he was arrested, has made a sufficient showing to justify setting aside his conviction. See, Brooks v. United States, 423 F. 2d 1149, 1152 n.4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 872, 91 [*303] S.Ct. 109, 27 L.Ed.2d 111 (1970). The trial was initially delayed because the government was unaware of the defendant’s location and thereafter because of his incarceration in a state prison. The defendant did not assert his right to a sp…
• Filimon Castillo Perez v. Sullivan, 793 F.2d 249 (10th Cir. 1986)
  …t's plea of guilty and sentencing, and then imposed maximum consecutive sentences. . There must be some showing of a causal relationship between delay and the prejudice claimed, Brooks v. United States, 423 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 400 U.S. 872, 91 S.Ct. 109, 27 L.Ed.2d 111 (1970). . The habitual offender proceeding in this case probably was a separate proceeding for Sixth Amendment purposes. In characterizing such a proceeding, the New Mexico Supreme Court stated "the charge is serious a…
• United States v. Campisi, 583 F.2d 692 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …294, 295 (N.D.Ind.1977). The Second and Eighth Circuits have adopted similar approaches in pre-Barker cases. See United States v. Tortorello, 391 F. 2d 587, 589 (2d Cir. 1968); Brooks v. United States, 423 F. 2d 1149, 1151-52 (8th Cir.) cert. denied 400 U.S. 872, 91 S.Ct. 109, 27 L.Ed.2d 111 (1970). . Other courts have rejected speedy trial claims in cases in which the period from the entry of a plea or of conviction to sentencing was considerably longer than it was here. See, e. g., Pollard v. United Stat…

  ← 1 / 2 →