JOHNSON

v.

MICHIGAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Jenness v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1971)
  …“all other registered voters in the State of Georgia desirous of having an opportunity to consider persons on the ballot other than nominees of the Democratic and Republican parties.” Georgia Socialist Workers Party v. Fortson, 315 F. Supp. 1035. 400 U. S. 877. Ga. Code Ann. § 34-103 (u). Ga. Code Ann. § 34-103 (s). See, e. g., Ga. Code Ann. §§ 34-1004 to 34-1006, 34-1008, 34-1009, 34-1014, 34-1015, 34-1102, 34-1301 to 34-1303; 34-1308, 34-1507, 34-1513. Ga. Code Ann. § 34-1001. Ga. Code Ann. § 34-10…
• Bowen v. United States Postal Serv., 459 U.S. 212 (U.S. 1983)
  …liable for portion of damages caused by its default but stating that apportionment would be proper where there was evidence “that but for the Union’s conduct the plaintiffs would have been reinstated or reimbursed at an earlier date”), cert, denied, 400 U. S. 877 (1970). While it is true these cases reach the same result as the dissent, they do not represent an affirmation of its reasoning. Other cases have recognized that damages should be apportioned between the union and the employer. See Smart v. Ellis…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Butler v. Local Union 823, 514 F.2d 442 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …a longer period of vulnerability for the employer than for the union. See Sanderson v. Ford Motor Co., 483 F. 2d 102, 114 (5th Cir. 1973); De Arroyo v. Sindicato de Trabajadores Packinghouse, AFL-CIO, 425 F. 2d 281, 286-287 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 877, 91 S.Ct. 117, 27 L.Ed.2d 114 (1970). On the other hand, the Second Circuit has held that the actions against employer and union ought to be of the same duration, and, therefore, has applied the written contract period of limitations to a fair repre…