PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE CO.

v.

FIGUEROA DE ARROYO ET AL.; AND FIGUEROA DE ARROYO ET AL. V. PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• Jenness v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1971)
  …“all other registered voters in the State of Georgia desirous of having an opportunity to consider persons on the ballot other than nominees of the Democratic and Republican parties.” Georgia Socialist Workers Party v. Fortson, 315 F. Supp. 1035. 400 U. S. 877. Ga. Code Ann. § 34-103 (u). Ga. Code Ann. § 34-103 (s). See, e. g., Ga. Code Ann. §§ 34-1004 to 34-1006, 34-1008, 34-1009, 34-1014, 34-1015, 34-1102, 34-1301 to 34-1303; 34-1308, 34-1507, 34-1513. Ga. Code Ann. § 34-1001. Ga. Code Ann. § 34-10…
• Bowen v. United States Postal Serv., 459 U.S. 212 (U.S. 1983)
  …liable for portion of damages caused by its default but stating that apportionment would be proper where there was evidence “that but for the Union’s conduct the plaintiffs would have been reinstated or reimbursed at an earlier date”), cert, denied, 400 U. S. 877 (1970). While it is true these cases reach the same result as the dissent, they do not represent an affirmation of its reasoning. Other cases have recognized that damages should be apportioned between the union and the employer. See Smart v. Ellis…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union NO. 6, 493 U.S. 67 (U.S. 1989)