TREFINA, A. G.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (66 total)

• Scavella v. Fernandez, 371 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …y by giving notice within 60 days. This argument is entirely unsound, primarily because the type of legislation involved in Jordan Chapel, and in E.B. Elliott Advertising Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 425 F. 2d 1141 (5th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 878, 91 S.Ct. 12, 27 L.Ed.2d 35 (1970), upon which Jordan Chapel was based, differs so greatly from that involved in this case. Both of the cited cases held that the state’s enactment of prohibitory-regulatory legislation dealing in the Elliott case wit…
• City OF Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …efed, argued and resolved by judicial decision. As a result of the ruling on defendants’ partial summary judgment motion, sub nom. Russ Toggs, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation, 304 F.Supp. 279 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff’d 426 F. 2d 850 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U. S. 878, 91 S.Ct. 119, 27 L.Ed.2d 115 (1970), the three national class actions were held to have been timely filed. However, the rulings clearly established that with respect to any unfiled cases, the statute of limitations expired in .September, 1968. A d…
• United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Indus., Inc., 517 F.2d 826 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …ured by a practical rather than technical yardstick. E. g., Martin v. Travelers Indem. Co., 5 Cir. 1971, 450 F. 2d 542, 554; Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp., 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F. 2d 1118, 1123-25, cert. denied sub nom., Trefina A.G. v. United States, 400 U.S. 878, 91 S.Ct. 118, 27 L.Ed.2d 115 (1970); Atlantis Development Corp. v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 379 F. 2d 818, 822-29. A denial of an application for intervention by right which was timely filed, as here, is subject to the usual scope of our appella…