PORT CONSTRUCTION CO.

v.

VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Park 'n Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc., 469 U.S. 189 (U.S. 1985)
  …ge” in the trademark context); Bada Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 426 F. 2d 8, 11 (CA9) (“[0]ne competitor will not be permitted to impoverish the language of commerce by preventing his fellows from fairly describing their own goods”), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 916 (1970). Additionally, before the Lanham Act was enacted, this Court, in Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 311, 323-324 (1872), wrote words that are still applicable today: “ ‘[T]he owner of an original trade-mark has an undoubted right to be protected i…
• San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Comm., 483 U.S. 522 (U.S. 1987)
  …the First Amendment. See also Bada Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 426 F. 2d 8, 11 (CA9) (“[0]ne competitor will not be permitted to impoverish the language of commerce by preventing his fellows from fairly describing their own goods”), cert. denied, 400 U. S. 916 (1970). The Lanham Act “provides national protection of trademarks in order to secure to the owner of the mark the goodwill of his business and to protect the ability of consumers to distinguish among competing producers.” Park ’N Fly, Inc., 469 U.…
• Mallis v. Bankers Tr. Co., 717 F.2d 683 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …new trial on a claim that the verdict is against [*691] the weight of the evidence. See Bevevino v. Saydjari, 574 F. 2d 676, 686 n. 30 (2d Cir.1978); Compton v. Luckenbach Overseas Corporation, 425 F. 2d 1130, 1132-33 & n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 916, 91 S.Ct. 175, 27 L.Ed.2d 155 (1970); Portman v. American Home Products Corporation, 201 F. 2d 847, 848 (2d Cir.1953); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2819, at 120-27 (1973). However, the denial of a new trial may be revi…

  ← 1 / 2 →