HAWTHORNE

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• In re Evans v. Violations OF 18 U.S.C. Sections 231, 452 F.2d 1239 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …“it is no matter that the acts would have been criminal under other statutes not within the permissible grant of immunity.” That same principle is applicable in this case. But see Licata v. United States, 429 F. 2d 1177 (9th Cir.), vacated as moot, 400 U.S. 938, 91 S.Ct. 239, 27 L.Ed.2d 243 (1970). The crimes itemized in § 2514 — the immunity statute at issue here — are all of the offenses listed in § 2516 and violations of the wiretapping provisions of the 1968 Act. . See p. 1241 supra. . 18 U.S.C., §…
• United States v. Singleton, 460 F.2d 1148 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …al, see Order Number 452-71, 36 Fed.Reg. 2601 [*1155] (Feb. 9, 1971).7 The certification need be in no specific technical form, although it should preferably be in writing, cf. Licata v. United States, 429 F. 2d 1177, 1180 (9 Cir.), vacated as moot, 400 U.S. 938, 91 S.Ct. 239, 27 L.Ed.2d 243 (1970). Furthermore, there was no showing of bad faith on the part of the Government; in fact, trafficking in narcotics was one of the specific evils engaged in by organized crime which Congress sought to attack throug…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Weinberg, 439 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …which they renew on this appeal. Under all of the circumstances we hold that appellants were not deprived of due process with regard to these contempt proceedings. See Licata v. United States, 429 F. 2d 1177, 1180 (9th Cir. 1970), vacated as moot, 400 U. S. 938, 91 S.Ct. 239, 27 L.Ed.2d 243.4 The same considerations which justify the holding of civil contempt proeeedings, absent the safeguards of indictment and jury (Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 371, 86 S.Ct. 1531, 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966)), war…