HAIRSTON

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sanders, 631 F.2d 1309 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …w doctrine applies only where “the incriminating nature of the article [seized is] immediately apparent.” At 1314. See United States v. Clark, 531 F. 2d 928, 932-33 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Molkenbur, 430 F. 2d 563 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 952, 91 S.Ct. 244, 27 [*1321] L.Ed.2d 258 (1970). The majority further determines that in the circumstances of this case the incriminating nature of a 2½ by 3 inch, heavy manila envelope is immediately apparent. This rather surprising conclusion shoul…
• United States v. Anderson, 552 F.2d 1296 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …S. at 466, 91 S.Ct. at 2038. The private property immediately adjacent to a home is entitled to the same protection against unreasonable search and seizure as the home itself. United States v. Molkenbur, 430 F. 2d 563, 566 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 952, 91 S.Ct. 244, 27 L.Ed.2d 258 (1970); Hobson v. United States, 226 F. 2d 890, 894 (8th Cir. 1955). See also Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583, 593, 94 S.Ct. 2464, 41 L.Ed.2d 325 (1974). Thus, when the agents entered Wood’s property, they invaded an ar…
• United States v. Follette, 462 F.2d 1041 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …d the New York special jury as not in violation of the equal protection or due process clauses. Two recent attacks in this circuit on the “blue-ribbon jury” have failed. United States ex rel. Torres v. Mancusi, 427 F. 2d 168 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 952, 91 S. Ct. 252, 27 L.Ed.2d 259 (1970); United States ex rel. Fein v. Deegan, 410 F. 2d 13, 22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 935, 89 S.Ct. 1997, 23 L.Ed.2d 450 (1969). We are not about to overrule both the Supreme Court and two previous panels of…