HARRIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Coronado, 554 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …es v. Mims, 440 F. 2d 643 (8th Cir. 1971) (on direct appeal from guilty plea where there was no rule 32(d) motion court would consider only whether there was compliance with rule 11); United States v. Briscoe, 428 F. 2d 954 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 966, 91 S.Ct. 378, 27 L.Ed.2d 386 (1970) (same); cf. United States v. Cooper, 410 F. 2d 1128 (5th Cir. 1969) cert. denied, 400 U.S. 868, 91 S.Ct. 111, 27 L.Ed.2d 107, (1970) (on appeal from denial of rule 32(d) motion court would not consider contention…
• United States v. Herzog, 644 F.2d 713 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …nolo contendere. Cases from our circuit hold generally that a guilty plea waives all non jurisdictional defects, e. g., Camp v. United States, 587 F. 2d 397, 399 (8th Cir. 1978); United States v. Briscoe, 428 F. 2d 954, 956 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 966, 91 S.Ct. 378, 27 L.Ed.2d 386 (1970), and that double jeopardy is a personal defense and not jurisdictional, e. g., McClain v. Brown, 587 F. 2d 389, 391 (8th Cir. 1978); Kistner v. United States, 332 F. 2d 978, 980 (8th Cir. 1964). Moreover, we have…
• United States v. George S. (Joe) Corbett, 742 F.2d 173 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …ss and in compliance with Rule 11."); United States v. Mims, 440 F. 2d 643, 644 (8th Cir.1971) (direct appeal alleging involuntariness; independent review of Rule 11 proceeding); United States v. Briscoe, 428 F. 2d 954, 957 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 966, 91 S.Ct. 378, 27 L.Ed.2d 386 (1970) ("Even though not presented to the trial court [nor specifically raised on appeal] it is nevertheless incumbent on this court to review the guilty plea proceeding as to its compliance with Fed.R. Crim.P. 11....")…