SCHLETTE
v.
CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.
SCHLETTE
CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.
400 U.S. 998
Supreme Court of the United States (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Jones, 475 F.2d 723 (5th Cir. 1973)…f he does ask and receive permission this is another circumstance bearing on the voluntariness of the consent. See, e. g., Cockerham v. Wainwright, supra, Bretti v. Wainwright, supra, United States v. White, 431 F. 2d 84 (5th Cir., 1970); cert. den. 400 U.S. 998, 91 S.Ct. 476, 27 L.Ed.2d 448. If Miranda warnings have been given, specific warnings of Fourth Amendment rights are not necessary to validate a search conducted after an otherwise voluntary consent. United States v. Canseco, 465 F. 2d 383 (5th Cir.…
-
Tabasko v. Barton, 472 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1972)…was on appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, which affirmed his conviction (State v. Tabasko, 22 Ohio St.2d 36, 257 N.E. 2d 744 (1970)), and subsequently while certiorari was sought and denied in the Supreme Court of the United States (Tabasko v. Ohio, 400 U.S. 998, 91 S.Ct. 452, 27 L.Ed.2d 450 (1971)). Bond has been continued during the instant habeas proceeding, likewise. Appellant, at the time concerned, was a student at Bowling Green State University. He, along with a number of other students, had leased…