THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD FLAVE SHEDAKER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1967-03-14
No. 66-156
Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
196 So. 2d 202 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed an order quashing a felony information, holding that the information was properly drawn under the relevant statute. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.


Holding

The information was properly drawn under § 800.04 Fla.Stat. Therefore, the order quashing the information was erroneous.


Key Quotes

“The information, as drawn, charged a crime within the purview of § 800.04 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.”

Establishes the court's finding that the information was correctly filed under the felony statute.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The State of Florida sought review of a lower court's order quashing an information that charged the appellee with a felony for committing a lewd, las…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Judge.

BARKDULL, Judge.

The State seeks review of a criminal court order quashing an information. See: § 924.07(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The information charged the appellee with a felony by committing a lewd, lascivious or indecent act in the presence of a female child of less than fourteen years of age, in violation of § 800.04 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The appellee moved to quash the information, contending that the alleged acts, at most, constituted an offense as a misdemeanor under § 800.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., which motion was granted.1

The information, as drawn, charged a crime within the purview of § 800.04 Fla. *203Stat, F.S.A. See: State v. Peacock, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 46. Therefore, we reverse the order. The cause and the ap-pellee are remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw