GROVE PRESS, INC., ET AL.
v.
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF CENSORS

U.S. | 1971-03-08
No. 63
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
401 U.S. 480 Supreme Court of the United States (1971) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 28 L. Ed. 2d 205 · 91 S. Ct. 966 · 1971 U.S. LEXIS 71 · SCDB 1970-060
Cited by 56 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (26 total)

  • …, NLRB v. Laney & Duke Storage Warehouse Co., 5 Cir. 1966, 369 F. 2d 859, 864. See also, NLRB v. W. S. Hatch Co., Inc., 9 Cir. 1973, 474 F. 2d 558, 561; NLRB v. Olson Bodies, Inc., 2 Cir. 1970, 420 F. 2d 1187, 1189, cert. denied, 1971, 401 U.S. 954, 91 S.Ct. 966, 28 L.Ed.2d 237. The Regional Director here found that the election was fairly conducted and that insufficient doubt was cast on the validity of the result to overcome the Board’s [*855] and the parties’ interest in the finality of the representati…
  • …f a purely administrative function, with no quasi about it, concerning which courts should not interfere save for the most glaring discrimination or abuse.” NLRB v. Olson Bodies, Inc., 2 Cir., 420 F. 2d 1187, 1189 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 954, 91 S.Ct. 966, 28 L.Ed.2d 237 (1971). The Board has been entrusted with broad discretion in determining the nature and extent of pre-election propaganda that will be allowed, NLRB v. Millard Metal Service Center, Inc., 472 F. 2d 647, 650 (1st Cir. 1973); NLRB v…
    1 / 2
  • Huffman v. United States, 470 F.2d 386 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
    …, 18 L.Ed.2d 1317 (1967), affirming, 245 Cal.App.2d 820, 54 Cal.Rptr. 177 (Dist.Ct.App.Calif.1966). . 54 Cal.Rptr. at 178, 245 Cal.App.2d at 822. We attack no precedential weight to tke 4 — 4 vote in Grove Press v. Maryland State Board of Censors, 401 U.S. 480, 91 S.Ct. 966, 28 L.Ed.2d 205 (1971) (Douglas, J., not participating), affirming Wagonheim v. Maryland State Board of Censors, 255 Md. 297, 258 A. 2d 240 (Ct.App.Md.1969), declaring “I am Curious (Yellow)” obscene. The state court said (258 A. 2d at…

Previewing 3 of 26 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw