PEPITONE

v.

PRELSNIK, SHERIFF, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ed, 414 U.S. 820, 94 S.Ct. 47, 38 L.Ed.2d 52 (1973). Finding overwhelming evidence against the defendant, the court in United States v. McKinney, 429 F. 2d 1019 (5th Cir.), modified & rev’d on rehearing, 434 F. 2d 831 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 922, 91 S.Ct. 910, 27 L.Ed.2d 825 (1971), affirmed the conviction. Moreover, the extrinsic evidence was not relevant to any material issue in the case. These cases illustrate that portion of the continuum in which jury misconduct fails to affect the ju…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• United States v. Howard, 506 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …owney v. Peyton, supra; United States ex rel. Owen v. McMann, supra. Rather, this is simply one in the matrix of factors that must be evaluated by the district court on remand. See United States v. McKinney, 5 Cir. 1971, 434 F. 2d 831, cert. denied, 401 U.S. 922, 91 S.Ct. 910, 27 L.Ed.2d 825, reconsidering United States v. McKinney, 5 Cir. 1970, 429 F. 2d 1019. Cf. Paz v. United States, 5 Cir. 1973, 473 F. 2d 662 (Paz II); Morgan v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 399 F. 2d 93, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1025, 89 S…
• United States v. Brantley, 733 F.2d 1429 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …ll investigation to ascertain whether the alleged jury misconduct actually occurred; if it occurred, he must determine whether or not it was prejudicial.” United States v. McKinney, 429 F. 2d 1019, 1026 (5th Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 922, 91 S.Ct. 910, 27 L.Ed.2d 825 (1971). See Port Terminal & Warehousing v. John S. James Co., 695 F. 2d 1328, 1341 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 999 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S.Ct. 2965, 73…