PENNSYLVANIA

v.

NEW YORK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State OF W. Va. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., 440 F.2d 1079 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …i v. Standard Oil Co., 431 F. 2d 1282 (1970), reversing the District Court for Hawaii which had allowed a private antitrust action to be brought by the state under this theory, although the Supreme Court has recently granted certiorari in this case, 401 U.S. 931, 91 S.Ct. 931, 28 L.Ed.2d 215 (1971).3 While in our view the court below might well have considered making use of a parens patriae theory in the present case (see, “State Protection of Its Economy and Environment” (supra)), Judge Wyatt made it quite…
• Pennsylvania v. NEW York, 407 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1972)
  …intiff, and appointed Mr. John F. Davis as a Special Master to take evidence and make appropriate reports. 400 U. S. 811. Thereafter, California and Indiana were permitted to intervene as plaintiffs, and Arizona as.a defendant. 400 U. S. 924, 1019 ; 401 U. S. 931. The exception of Indiana as to a typographical error in the recommended decree is sustained. The phrase “escheat of custodial taking” in paragraph 2, lines 4-5 of the decree should read “escheat or custodial taking-.” The. Pennsylvania statute, A…