RICHARDSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

v.

BELCHER

Citator

Cited By

• Lynch v. Household Fin. Corp., 405 U.S. 538 (U.S. 1972)
  …d that relief was barred by the statute prohibiting injunctions against state court proceedings, 28 U. S. C. § 2283. 318 F. Supp. 1111. We noted probable jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1253,5 to consider the jurisdictional issues presented. 401 U. S. 935. [*542] We hold, for the reasons that follow, that neither § 1343 (3) nor § 2283 warranted dismissal of the appellant’s complaint. Accordingly, we remand the case to the District Court for consideration of the remaining issues in this litigation. I…
• Richardson v. Belcher, 404 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1971)
  …ts that have considered the question,2 held the statute unconstitutional. 317 F. Supp. 1294. The Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare appealed directly to this Court under 28 U. S. C. § 1252.3 We noted probable jurisdiction, 401 U. S. 935, and the case was briefed and argued on the merits. We now reverse the judgment of the District Court. In our last consideration of a challenge to the constitutionality of a classification created under the Social Security Act, we held that “a pers…
• United States v. Brewster, 408 U.S. 501 (U.S. 1972)
  …ment, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, as they apply to Senator Brewster.” The United States filed a direct appeal to this Court, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. § 3731 (1964 ed., Supp. V).4 We postponed consideration of jurisdiction until hearing the case on the merits. 401 U. S. 935 (1971). I The United States asserts that this Court has jurisdiction under 18 U. S. C. § 3731 (1964 ed., Supp. V) to [*505] review the District Court’s dismissal of the indictment against appellee. Specifically, the United States urges that the Di…