TEXAS GULF SULPHUR COMPANY, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
DOWNTOWN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
TEXAS GULF SULPHUR COMPANY, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
DOWNTOWN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
196 So. 2d 436
Florida Supreme Court (1967)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
We issued a writ of certiorari because of •an apparent conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal, 188 So.2d 19 in the instant case and decisions of other District Courts of Appeal on the same point of law. After a careful study of the record in light of the briefs and oral argument, we have concluded that the writ was improvidently issued and must, therefore, be discharged on jurisdictional grounds.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
THOMAS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Webb Dean v. McLEOD, 270 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1972)…e original'order is remedial and this Court has held that remedial treatments should not be considered as payment of compensation so as to toll the running of the limitation period in Fla. Stat. § 440,28, F.S.A. Mansell v. Mulberry Construction Co., 196 So. 2d 436 (Fla.1967). The Court also ruled in Mansell that remedial medical treatment does act to toll the limitation period of Fla.Stat. § 440.13(3) (b), F.S.A., which specifically deals with modification of orders of remedial medical treatment. Dean’s posit…
-
Budget Luxury Inns, Inc. v. Boston, 407 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…Food Fair Stores, 400 So. 2d 793 (Fla.1981). The claimant also argues that her receipt of medical benefits under the original, continuing order tolled the running of the statute. This argument, however, ignores Mansell v. Mulberry Construction Co., 196 So. 2d 436 (Fla.1967), holding that remedial treatment provided by an e/c should not be considered a “payment of compensation” so as to toll the running of the limitation period in Section 440.28. See also Dean v. McLeod, 270 So. 2d 726 (Fla.1972). Mansell rec…
-
Keller Kitchen Cabinets & Alexis, Inc. v. Holder, 586 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…further disability compensation benefits even though medical benefits continue to be paid. E.g. Dean v. McLeod, 270 So. 2d 726 (Fla.1972); Brantley v. ADH Building Contractors, Inc., [*1138] 215 So. 2d 297 (Fla.1968); Mansell v. Mulberry Const. Co., 196 So. 2d 436 (Fla.1967); Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Tokayer, 167 So. 2d 563 (Fla.1964); Ford v. Alexander Cabinet Co., 467 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Budget Luxury Inns v. Boston, 407 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Early on, the harsh and sometimes irratio…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tex. Gulf Sulphur Co., Inc. v. Downtown Inv. Co., 188 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)