PRATZ ET AL.

v.

LOUISIANA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (U.S. 1982)
  …ere remains a respectable opinion to the contrary .... Any other rule would mean that courts and not legislatures would determine all matters of public policy.” Williams v. McNair, 316 F. Supp. 134, 137 (SC 1970) (footnote omitted), summarily aff’d, 401 U. S. 951 (1971). See Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 450 U. S. 455, 456 (1981) (invalidating statute “that gave husband, as ‘head and master’ of property jointly owned with his wife, the unilateral right to dispose of such property without his spouse’s consent”); We…
• Vorchheimer v. Sch. Dist. OF Philadelphia & Matthew W. Costanzo, 532 F.2d 880 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …ould distinguish between issues upon which the courts have not ruled, and issues on which the courts have previously rejected an equal protection challenge. The majority opinion, pointing to Williams v. McNair, 316 F.Supp. 134 (D.S.C. 1970), aff’d, 401 U.S. 951, 91 S.Ct. 976, 28 L.Ed.2d 235 (1971) (per curiam), assumes that the Court has rejected an equal protection challenge to a sex-based dual school system. I have serious reservations about the precedential value of the Court’s summary affirmance in Wil…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Burton Andrew Wark v. Robbins, 458 F.2d 1295 (1st Cir. 1972)
  …nstitutionality of Maine’s system of confining male and female felons in different institutions. Such a claim would embrace a broader range of disparate treatment of the sexes. Whatever might be the merits of such a case, but see Williams v. McNair, 401 U.S. 951, 91 S. Ct. 976, 28 L.Ed.2d 235 (1971),5 that was not the case presented to either the state or the district court. Our question, therefore, is whether a female state prisoner lodged in the Women’s Reformatory and a male inmate of the State Prison ar…