HADNOTT ET AL.

v.

AMOS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ALABAMA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Marengo Cnty. Comm'n, 731 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …United States v. Marengo County, S.D. Ala., No. 1567; United States v. Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of Greene County, 1966, S.D.Ala., 254 F.Supp. 543; Hadnott v. Amos, 1970, M.D.Ala., 320 F.Supp. 107 (3 judge court), aff’d mem., 1971, 401 U.S. 968, 91 S.Ct. 1189, 28 L.Ed.2d 318, and 1972, 405 U.S. 1035, 92 S.Ct. 1304, 31 L.Ed.2d 576. . The district court cited Nevett v. Sides as authority for its conclusion that apathy, not polarized voting, was responsible for the consistent failure of blac…
• United States v. Anderson, 481 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1973)
  …District (1969) 395 U.S. 621, 89 S.Ct. 1886, 23 L.Ed.2d 583. Unreasonable residence requirements, imposed by the State, are likewise invalid, whether for state or federal elections. Hadnott v. Amos (Three-judge, ct. Ala.1970) 320 F.Supp. 107, aff’d. 401 U.S. 968, 91 S.Ct. 1189, 28 L.Ed.2d 318. It is, of course, true, as Justice Stewart observed in United States v. Guest, supra (383 U.S. at 755, 86 S.Ct. at 1176) that, “[i]t is a commonplace that rights under the Equal Protection Clause itself arise only whe…
• ELY v. Klahr, 403 U.S. 108 (U.S. 1971)
  …cy-requirement for candidates. The Hawaii Supreme Court upheld the law in late August. An application for an injunction was denied. When the appeal finally came up for consideration on the merits, again after the election, it was, dismissed as moot, 401 U. S. 968. In Sirak v. Brown a state durational residency requirement for voters was upheld and, when this Court denied an injunction, 400 U. S. 809, the plaintiff chose not to docket his appeal, probably on the basis of Hall v. Beals, supra. A similar issue…