NORMAN

v.

CARLSON, DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.; COAKLEY V. PERINI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; MCCLINDON V. FIELD, MEN'S COLONY SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.; IN RE ORTEGA; TAYLOR V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.; HOOD V. TENNESSEE ET AL.; AND JAMES V. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Generes et vir, 405 U.S. 93 (U.S. 1972)
  …olved. The taxpayer, Allen H. Generes,3 prevailed in a jury trial in the District Court. See 67-2 U. S. T. C. ¶9754 (ED La.). On the Government’s appeal, the Fifth Circuit affirmed by a divided vote. 427 F. 2d 279 (CA5 1970). Certiorari was granted, 401 U. S. 972 (1971), to resolve a conflict among the circuits.4 [*97] I The taxpayer as a young man in 1909 began work in the construction business. His son-in-law, William F. Kelly, later engaged independently in similar work. During World War II the two men f…
• Roudebush v. Hartke, 405 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1972)
  …rt might order . ...”5 Following the Senate’s decision to seat him, Hartke moved to dismiss the appeals as moot. We consolidated both appeals and postponed further consideration of questions of jurisdiction to the hearing of the cause on the merits. 401 U. S. 972. I We consider first the claim that these appeals are moot. This claim is based upon the proposition, as stated in appellee Hartke’s brief, that the “basic issue” before the Court is “whether appellee Hartke or appellant Roude-bush is entitled to…