YAHR ET AL.

v.

RESOR, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bernard v. Binnings Constr. Co., Inc., 741 F.2d 824 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …floating dry-docks. Id. at 283 (citing Cope v. Vallette Dry-Dock Co., 119 U.S. 625, 7 S.Ct. 336, 30 L.Ed. 501 (1887) (dry dock not a vessel for salvage purposes)). See also Chahoc v. Hunt Shipyard, 431 F. 2d 576, 577 (5th Cir.1970), cert, denied, 401 U.S. 982, 91 S.Ct. 1198, 28 L.Ed.2d 333 (1971) (“[A] floating dry dock [is] not a ‘vessel’ while moored to the bank and operated as a dry dock.”). In Keller v. Dravo Corp., 441 F. 2d 1239 (5th Cir.1971), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 1017, 92 S.Ct. 679, 30 L.Ed.2…
• Davis v. Cargill, Inc., 808 F.2d 361 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …t is moored and in use as a dry dock.” Keller v. Dravo Corp., 441 F. 2d 1239, 1244 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1017, 92 S.Ct. 679, 30 L.Ed.2d 665 (1972). See also Chahoc v. Hunt Shipyard, 431 F. 2d 576, 577 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 982, 91 S.Ct. 1198, 28 L.Ed.2d 333 (1971); Atkins v. Greenville Shipbuilding Corp., 411 F. 2d 279, 282-83 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 846, 90 S.Ct. 105, 24 L.Ed.2d 96 (1969). In Atkins, we noted that in Cope v. Vallette Dry-Dock Co., 119 U.S. 6…
• United States v. Jenkins, 974 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …nstitutional questions. “Constitutional questions should be decided only when unavoidable, and this is particularly true when the issue is raised on appeal from an interlocutory order.” Yahr v. Resor, 431 F. 2d 690, 691 (4th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 982, 91 S.Ct. 1192, 28 L.Ed.2d 334 (1971). See also Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc., 472 U.S. 491, 501-03, 105 S.Ct. 2794, 2800-02, 86 L.Ed.2d 394 (1985). If we were to consider Jenkins’ facial challenges to RICO at this stage in the proceedings, w…