MOORE

v.

INDIANA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Albany Welf. Rights Org. v. Wyman, 493 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …he private interviewing of welfare recipients. On the one hand, it is not an appropriate place for a picket line or demonstrations. In that sense, it is not a traditional forum of protest. LeClair v. O’Neil, 307 F.Supp. 621 (D.C.Mass. 1969), aff’d, 401 U.S. 984, 91 S.Ct. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d 524 (1971). On the other hand, a waiting room is a proper place for private conversation with those waiting to be served. Here we apply the distinction between the communication of ideas by conduct and the communication of…
• Quarterman v. Byrd, 453 F.2d 54 (4th Cir. 1971)
  …Discipline Committee of East Tenn. State Univ., supra, 419 F. 2d at p. 199. The school authorities are not required to “wait until the potential (for disorder) is realized before acting.” LeClair v. O’Neil (D.C.Mass.1969) 307 F.Supp. 621, 625, aff. 401 U.S. 984, 91 S.Ct. 1219, 28 L.Ed.2d 524. And if there are substantial facts which reasonably support a forecast of likely disruption, the judgment of the school authorities in denymg permission and in exercising restraint will normally be sustained. Butts v.…
• United States v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 461 F.2d 58 (4th Cir. 1972)
  …ganization rendering the services * * * ”. (Italics added.) These provisions were construed in United States v. United Services Automobile Association (5th Cir., 1970) 431 F. 2d 735, cert. denied 400 U.S. 992, 91 S.Ct. 459, 27 L.Ed.2d 440, reh. den. 401 U.S. 984, 91 S.Ct. 1188, 28 L.Ed.2d 338,2 to authorize the United States to recover as a third-party beneficiary for medical services rendered by the United States to an insured’s dependent pursuant to Section 1076, 10 U.S.C.3 This result appears [*60] sound…