AUSTIN

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Socialist Labor Party v. Gilligan, 406 U.S. 583 (U.S. 1972)
  …or of all of appellants’ constitutional challenges to the Ohio election laws except that involving the oath requirement, with respect to which it ruled in favor of the appellees. Both sides appealed to this Court, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 401 U. S. 991 (1971). Since then, the posture of this litigation has undergone a significant change. On December 23, 1971, the Ohio Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 460, which embodied an extensive revision of the state election code. Both sides now agree tha…
• Swarb v. Lennox, 405 U.S. 191 (U.S. 1972)
  …ranted declaratory and injunctive relief only for a limited class of cognovit signers. 314 F. Supp. 1091 (ED Pa. 1970). The plaintiffs, but not the defendants, appealed. We noted probable jurisdiction the same day certiorari was granted in Overmyer. 401 U. S. 991. I The cognovit system is firmly entrenched in Pennsylvania and has long been in effect there. A confession of judgment for money “may be entered by the prothonotary . . . without the agency of an attorney and without the fifing of a complaint, d…
• ELY v. Klahr, 403 U.S. 108 (U.S. 1971)
  …s are involved in several cases pending this Term. In one, the District Court handed down its decision late in July 1970. By that decision several sections of the Ohio laws were invalidated and we noted probable jurisdiction. Gilligan v. Sweetenham, 401 U. S. 991. A loyalty oath was upheld and we noted probable jurisdiction in that case. Socialist Labor Party v. Gilligan, 401 U. S. 991. • The court also upheld a provision requiring independent candidates to file at the same time as major party candidates. Sw…

  ← 1 / 2 →