BOWLES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• The Ins. Co. OF the State OF Pa. v. The Est. OF Frank Guzman, 421 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …bition against asking the question. As in Faver, I would adopt the views expressed by Judges Bazelon and Wright in their dissenting opinions found in Bowles v. United States, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 26, 439 F. 2d 536 (D.C.Cir.1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 1240, 28 L.Ed.2d 533 (1971). I thus conclude the judgment should be reversed and a directed verdict entered for defendant.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Earnest Bell v. State, 614 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
  …8 F. 2d 1116, 1123 (10th Cir.1981); United States v. Vandetti, 623 F. 2d 1144, 1148 (6th Cir.1980); United States v. Johnson, 488 F. 2d 1206, 1211 (1st Cir.1973); Bowles v. United States, 439 F. 2d 536, 541-42 (D.C.Cir.1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 1240, 28 L.Ed.2d 533 (1971); Apfel v. State, 429 So. 2d 85, 86-87 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Faver v. State, 393 So. 2d 49, 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Reversed and remanded for a new trial.…
• Faver v. State, 393 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …vilege and the extent and validity of the claim. (Citations omitted). The rationale for this rule was further explained by Judge Leventhal in Bowles v. United States, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 26, 439 F. 2d 536, 541-2 (D.C.Cir.1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 995, 91 S.Ct. 1240, 28 L.Ed.2d 533 (1971): The rule is grounded not only in the constitutional notion that guilt may not be inferred from the exercise of the Fifth Amendment privilege but also in the danger that a witness’s invoking the Fifth Amendment…