SHIPYARD DRIVE-IN THEATRE, INC., ET AL.

v.

SCUNCIO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State OF Ariz. & Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Atchison, 656 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …n that it was in error about what it intended statutory language to mean. Arizona’s premise is, however, erroneous. The court decision to which it refers is Apache County v. Atchison, T. & S.F.R.R., 106 Ariz. 356, 476 P. 2d 657 (1970), app. dism’d, 401 U.S 1005, 91 S.Ct. 1257, 28 L.Ed.2d 542 (1971) (Apache County). In that case the court rejected claims by the railroads that its property assessment scheme was unconstitutional. The railroads raised three grounds of unconstitutionality: (1) the scheme violat…
• Transp. Indem. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 620 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …a Ins. Co., 481 F. 2d 138, 148 (5th Cir. 1973); Galloway v. Employers Mut. of Wausau, 286 So. 2d 676, 679 (La.App.1973); Berry v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 240 So. 2d 243, 246 (La.App.), writ refused, 256 La. 914, 240 So. 2d 374 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1005, 91 S.Ct. 1255, 28 L.Ed.2d 541 (1971). We cannot say the district judge was wrong in concluding that, under Oregon law, the contract is clear and unambiguous. C. Coverage of SWF Finally, Transport contends that the district judge erred in refusi…
• Montgomery v. Otis Elevator Co., 472 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …fficer, or director. Maxey v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 255 So. 2d 120 (La.App.), writ ref’d, 260 La. 123, 255 So. 2d 351 (1971); Berry v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 240 So. 2d 243 (La.Ct.App.), writ ref’d, 256 La. 914, 240 So. 2d 374 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1005, 92 S.Ct. 1255, 28 L.Ed.2d 541 (1971); Adams v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 107 So. 2d 496 (La.Ct.App.1958). Summary judgment was correctly granted in favor of Albert. As to Lysle, plaintiff testified in his deposition that prior to the accident he told L…