EPPS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1971-04-05
No. 56
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that motion of counsel for respondent to dismiss petition as moot should be granted. See dissenting opinions in Durham v. United States, supra, p. 483.
401 U.S. 1006 Supreme Court of the United States (1971) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1973)
    …78 (1968); Felton v. City of Pensacola, 390 U. S. 340 (1968); Henry v. Louisiana, 392 U. S. 655 (1968); Cain v. Kentucky, supra; Bloss v. Dykema, 398 U. S. 278 (1970); Walker v. Ohio, 398 U. S. 434 (1970); Hoyt v. Minnesota, supra; Childs v. Oregon, 401 U. S. 1006 (1971); Bloss v. Michigan, 402 U. S. 938 (1971); Burgin v. South Carolina, 404 U. S. 809 (1971); Hartstein v. Missouri, 404 U. S. 988 (1971); Wiener v. California, 404 U. S. 988 (1971). Although I did not join the opinion of the Court in Stanley v.…
  • Maheu v. Hughes Tool Co., 569 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1977)
    …Baranov, 9 Cir., 1973, 474 F. 2d 591; Wasserman v. Municipal Court, 9 Cir., 1971, 449 F. 2d 787, vacated on other grounds, 413 U.S. 911, 93 S.Ct. 3036, 37 L.Ed.2d 1025; and Childs v. Oregon, 9 Cir., 1970, 431 F. 2d 272, rev’d on other grounds, 1971, 401 U.S. 1006, 91 S.Ct. 1248, 28 L.Ed.2d 542, are obscenity cases, which we consider to be sui generis. In each, we conducted a de novo review to determine whether, under the applicable constitutional standard, the materials in question were constitutionally prot…
  • United States v. Honorable Irving Hill, 473 F.2d 759 (9th Cir. 1972)
    …te courts must make for themselves on constitutional issues. Nowhere is it suggested that a trial court may take over, pre-try and decide this type of constitutional issue in a pre-trial hearing. In Childs v. Oregon, 431 F. 2d 272 (CA9 1970), rev’d. 401 U.S. 1006, 91 S.Ct. 1248, 28 L.Ed.2d 542 (1971), the Court is speaking of the duty of an appellate court to examine the evidence and determine if it is of such a nature to be properly submitted to the jury. The language of the opinion does not touch the probl…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw