MALONE

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Maier, 378 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …*1292] defendant’s subsequent identification by the victim at a photo lineup. Citing and relying upon the likewise similar case of Lockridge v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 3 Cal.3d 166, 89 Cal.Rptr. 731, 474 P. 2d 683 (1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 910, 91 S.Ct. 1387, 28 L.Ed.2d 652 (1971), the court held that the identification testimony was properly not suppressed below. It stated at 364 A. 2d 383-384, in language directly applicable here: We are satisfied that Mr. Mastronardo’s [the victim’s]…
• United States v. Schmidt, 573 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1978)
  ….S.2d 793, 796-797, 300 N.E. 2d 139, 141-42 (C.A.N.Y.1973) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1033, 1050, 94 S.Ct. 462, 38 L.Ed.2d 324 (1973); Lockridge v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 3 Cal.3d 166, 89 Cal.Rptr. 731, 474 P. 2d 683 (1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 910, 91 S.Ct. 1387, 28 L.Ed.2d 652 (1971). See Note, 43 A.L.R.3d 385, 404; McGuire, “How to Unpoison the Fruit,” 55 J.Crim.L.C.&.P.S. 307, 313— 17 (1964). But see Pitler, “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree,” 56 Cal.L.Rev. 579, 627-30 (1968). . The court held…