RUSH

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Gustafson v. State, 273 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
  …supra; People v. Johnson, supra; People v. Spencer, supra; McNish v. State, 45 Fla. 83, 34 So. 219 (1903); People v. Taylor, 33 Ill.2d 417, 211 N.E. 2d 673 (1965); People v. Landgham, 122 Ill.App.2d 9, 257 N.E. 2d 484 (1st Dist. 1970), cert. denied 402 U.S. 911, 91 S.Ct. 1389, 28 L.Ed.2d 652 (1971); Bynum v. State, 490 P. 2d 531 (Okl.Cr.1971). Cf. State v. Outten, 206 So. 2d 392 (Fla.1968) quashing Outten v. State, 197 So. 2d 594 (Fla.App.1967). This is not to say that the confessor is perpetually disable…
• United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1977)
  …ee, e. g., United States v. Schleis, 543 F. 2d 59 (CA8 1976), cert. pending, No. 76 — 5722; United States v. Battle, 166 U. S. App. D. C. 396, 510 F. 2d 776 (1975) ; United States ex rel. Muhammad v. Mancusi, 432 F. 2d 1046 (CA2 1970), cert. denied, 402 U. S. 911 (1971). “ ‘My basic premise is that Fourth Amendment doctrine, given force and effect by the exclusionary rule, is primarily intended to regulate the police in their day-to-day activities and thus ought to be expressed in terms that are readily app…
• Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552 (U.S. 1980)
  …e infra, at 561. See Gamer v. United States, supra, at 658, n. 11; Hoffman v. United States, 341 V. S. 479, 486 (1951); Mason v. United States, 244 U. S. 362, 364-366 (1917); United States v. Vermeulen, 436 F. 2d 72, 76-77 (CA2 1970), cert. denied, 402 U. S. 911 (1971). It is the duty of a court to determine the legitimacy of a witness’ reliance upon the Fifth Amendment. Rogers v. United States, 340 U. S. 367, 374-375 (1951). A witness may not employ the privilege to avoid giving testimony that he simply wo…