ECKELS ET AL.

v.

ROSS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (60 total)

• Telfare v. State, 529 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …tified the code words as referring only to rock cocaine. . We note that federal decisions are in accord with this holding. See United States v. Haymes, 610 F. 2d 309 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Ippolito, 438 F. 2d 417 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 953, 91 S.Ct. 1620, 29 L.Ed.2d 123 (1971).…
• Mead Data Cent., Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …e is not lost because client’s attorney consults other attorneys about subject matter of the communication). . See United States v. Pipkins, supra, 528 F. 2d at 562-63; United States v. Silverman, 430 F. 2d 106, 121-22 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 953, 91 S.Ct. 1619, 29 L.Ed.2d 123 (1971). . United States v. McDonald, 313 F. 2d 832 (2d Cir. 1963); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 391 F.Supp. 1029, 1033 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Doe v. A Corp., 330 F.Supp. 1352, 1355 (S.D.N.Y.1971), aff'd sub nom., H…
• United States v. Bermudez, 526 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …ant since such knowledge bears on the credibility of reliability of the witness’s assertion. See Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469, 69 S.Ct. 213, 93 L.Ed. 168 (1948);2 United States v. Silverman, 430 F. 2d 106, 125-26 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 953, 91 S.Ct. 1619, 29 L.Ed.2d 123 (1970); 3A J. Wigmore, Evidence § 988 (Chadbourn ed. 1970). It was proper for the trial court to allow the question whether the witness “had heard” of the disparaging rumor “as negativing the reputation.” Id. The pro…