HOLMES

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (U.S. 1972)
  …unity from the use of compelled testimony and evidence derived therefrom (“use and derivative use” immunity), or whether it is necessary to grant immunity from prosecution for offenses to which compelled testimony relates (“transactional” immunity). 402 U. S. 971 (1971). I The power of government to compel persons to testify in court or before grand juries and other governmental agencies is firmly established in Anglo-American jurisprudence.2 The power with respect to courts was established by statute in E…
• S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1972)
  …, 433 F. 2d, at 1381. The Commissioner did not base his opinion on any issue of fraud or bad faith of the contractor against the United States, nor did the Court of Claims. The case is now here on a petition for writ of certiorari which we granted. 402 U. S. 971. Petitioner argues that neither the text nor the legislative history of the Wunderlich Act supports the right of the United States to seek judicial review of an administrative decision on a contractual dispute, that the General Accounting Office wa…
• In re Bacon v. United States, 446 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …to the contrary on this precise question. See Charleston v. United States (Herlicy v. United States) 444 F. 2d 504 (9th Cir. 1971), and Stewart v. United States (Kastigar v. United States), 440 F. 2d 954 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. granted May 17, 1971, 402 U.S. 971, 91 S.Ct. 1668, 29 L.Ed.2d 135. After three and one-half days of testifying before the grand jury, appellant filed a motion to compel the disclosure of electronic surveillance by the Government and to obtain a hearing thereon. She contended that bo…