GINSBURG

v.

RICHARDSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …344 (1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976). . See also, e. g., United States v. Delay, 500 F. 2d 1360, 1365 (8th Cir. 1974) (dictum); Hale v. United States, 435 F. 2d 737, 746 (5th Cir. 1970) (dictum), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 976, 91 S.Ct. 1680, 29 L.Ed.2d 142 (1971). In all of these cases the reviewing courts looked to the voir dire as part of their inquiry whether “the totality of the circumstances raise[d] the probability of prejudice.” United States v. McNally, 485 F. 2d…
• United States v. Thevis, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …ial court held that it lacked authority to grant immunity to any witness. Before this court, appellants concede that the court lacked statutory authority to grant immuni [*639] ty, see United States v. Smith, 436 F. 2d 787 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 976, 91 S.Ct. 1680, 29 L.Ed.2d 142 (1971); they contend, however, that a defendant’s due process right to a fair trial gives trial courts inherent authority to confer use immunity. Appellants’ due process argument subdivides into two parts. First they…
• United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …sturbed on appeal unless the procedures used or the questions propounded are so unreasonable or devoid of the constitutional purpose as to constitute an abuse of that discretion.” Haslam v. United States, 431 F. 2d 362, 364 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 976, 91 S.Ct. 1680, 29 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). “It is not an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to insist upon conducting a voir dire examination, but if he does so, he must exercise a sound ‘judicial’ discretion in the acceptance or rejection of suppl…