CLEMENT A. EVANS & CO., INC.

v.

A. M. KIDDER & CO., INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Co., 489 F.2d 579 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ntly been required as an element of proof in this Circuit in cases alleging violations of Rule 10b-5. See, e. g., Herpich v. Wallace, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F. 2d 792, 804; Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 5 Cir. 1970, 434 F. 2d 100, 103, cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988, 91 S.Ct. 1660, 29 L.Ed.2d 153. And we reiterate that the elements to be proved to establish a violation of Section 14(e) are identical to those under the Rule. There is no question of requiring plaintiffs to prove scienter in its strict common law…
• Dupuy v. Dupuy, 551 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …mong the circuits. This Court established “due diligence” as a separate element in 10b-5 cases, apart from questions of materiality, reliance, or defendants’ duties. Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 5 Cir. 1970, 434 F. 2d 100, cert. denied, 1971, 402 U.S. 988, 91 S.Ct. 1660, 29 L.Ed.2d 153, rehearing denied, 404 U.S. 874, 92 S.Ct. 26, 30 L.Ed.2d 120; accord Bird v. Ferry, 5 Cir. 1974, 497 F. 2d 112, rehearing denied, 5 Cir., 503 F. 2d 567; Vohs v. Dickson, 5 Cir. 1974, 495 F. 2d 607.17 By considering ind…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Woodward v. Metro Bank OF Dallas, 522 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …the facts and circumstances of the new case. See Herpich v. Wallace, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F. 2d 792; accord, Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 5 Cir. 1970, 434 F. 2d 100, 103, cert. denied sub nom. Clement A. Evans & Co. v. A. M. Kidder & Co., 1971, 402 U.S. 988, 91 S.Ct. 1660, 29 L.Ed.2d 153. The court must ask whether the conduct in the case before it was the type of behavior meant to be [*91] forbidden by the securities acts,15 remembering that business transactions are not all reducible to a purchase or…