PENNSYLVANIA

v.

DAVIS

Citator

Cited By (42 total)

• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …presents the views of the members of the panel, except as specially noted in Judge John-sen’s separate concurring and dissenting opinion. . See United States v. DeSapio, S.D.N.Y., 299 F.Supp. 436, 448-449, aff’d, 2 Cir., 435 F. 2d 272, cert. denied 402 U.S. 999, 91 S.Ct. 2170, 29 L.Ed.2d 166. That some interstate travel is actually required by the statute is indicated by § 1952’s use of the term “facility in interstate or foreign commerce” rather than “facility of interstate or foreign commerce.” . Q. Do…
• United States v. Archer, 486 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …ify the inference that the use of interstate telephone calls was not a casual and incidental occurrence but the fulfillment of an integral part of the conspiratorial consensus.” In United States v. DeSapio, 435 F. 2d 272 (2 Cir. 1970), cert, denied, 402 U.S. 999, 91 S. Ct. 2170, 29 L.Ed.2d 166 (1971), the interstate acts were much less numerous, see 435 F. 2d at 275-276, 278, but one of them, the meeting at Fried’s horsefarm, [*681] which was reached by interstate travel at his suggestion, was the occasion…
• United States v. Milan Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …pursuant to Rule 14. Id. at 1129-30; see United States v. DeSapio, 435 F. 2d 272, 280 (2d Cir.1970) (defendant must demonstrate more than greater level of involvement and culpability of co-defendants or “a better chance of acquittal”), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 999, 91 S.Ct. 2170, 29 L.Ed.2d 166.21 IV The judgments of conviction are affirmed. . As will be seen, Caran, a key witness for the Government in this case, was a major participant in the affairs of appellants’ criminal enterprise. He was convicted in…