SWANK, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID

v.

RODRIGUEZ ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Rodway v. The United States Dep't of Agric., 514 F.2d 809 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …ts.” 5 U.S.C. § 553(a)(2). The food stamp program would appear to be a matter relating to public “grants” or “benefits,” thereby exempting rules relating to the program from the APA. See Rodriguez v. Swank, N.D.Ill, 318 F.Supp. 289 (1970), affirmed, 403 U.S. 901, 91 S.Ct. 2202, 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971) (A.F.D.C. benefits excluded). See generally Bonfield, Public Participation in Federal Rulemaking Relating to Public Property, Loans, Grants, Benefits, or Contracts, 118 U.Pa.L.Rev. 540 (1970). [*814] On July 24,…
• Humana OF S.C., Inc. v. Califano, 590 F.2d 1070 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …L.Rev. at 573-574. See also Reed v. Gardner, 261 F.Supp. 87 (C.D.Cal.1966); O’Neil, Unconstitutional Conditions: Welfare Benefíts with Strings Attached, 54 Cal.L.Rev. 443 (1966). . See Rodriguez v. Swank, 318 F.Supp. 289, 296 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff'd, 403 U.S. 901, 91 S.Ct. 2202, 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971) (“Congress might reasonably have concluded that greater flexibility in promulgation was needed in the area of grants-in-aid in order to provide for their expeditious administration”); cf. Rainbow Valley Citrus C…
• Rothstein v. Wyman, 467 F.2d 226 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …necessary to carry out the judgment would have to come at least in part from the state. On appeal to the Supreme Court, there is no reference of any kind to that matter in the Supreme Court’s lengthy affirming opinion.9 [*240] In Swank v. Rodriguez, 403 U.S. 901, 91 S.Ct. 2202, 29 L.Ed.2d 677 (1971), the Supreme Court summarily affirmed an appeal from a decision of a three-judge district court in Illinois holding invalid a state regulation forbidding assistance payments to new applicants for periods prior t…