STRONG ET AL.

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …esolve that issue. Whether an item is government property ordinarily is a question of law, and when the facts so establish, it is proper for the court to give such an instruction. United States v. Jackson, 436 F. 2d 39 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 906, 91 S.Ct. 2209, 29 L.Ed.2d 682 (1971); United States v. Friedman, 445 F. 2d 1076, 1087 (9th Cir. 1971). Id. at 1210-1211. Compare also United States v. Owens, 536 F. 2d 340 (10th Cir. 1976). We need not, and specifically do not, decide which appro…
• United States v. Pheaster, 544 F.2d 353 (9th Cir. 1976)
  …Davis if he wanted to reconsider his decision to remain silent, in view of the picture; the questioning did not resume until after Davis had voluntarily agreed that it should [see U. S. v. Jackson, 436 F. 2d 39, 40-41 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 906 [91 S.Ct. 2209, 29 L.Ed.2d 682] (1971)]. The Government has met its heavy burden of showing that Davis’s waiver of his rights to remain silent and to counsel, signed before he confessed, was made knowingly and intelligently. There is no evidence of…
• United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …me means and “no” to others, although unified consideration of the count might have produced an acquittal or at least a hung jury. These concerns apparently influenced the courts in United States v. James, 432 F. 2d 303 (5th Cir.1970), cert, denied, 403 U.S. 906, 91 S.Ct. 2214, 29 L.Ed.2d 682 (1971) (interrogatory asked jury to identify objects of a conspiracy); United States v. Spock, supra (identification of means of committing the offense); Gray v. United States, supra (same), although jury identificatio…